|
Post by ThirdMan on Jan 1, 2023 21:06:17 GMT -8
Here we are now, entertain us.
|
|
|
Post by ThirdMan on Jan 1, 2023 21:14:26 GMT -8
I figured I wouldn't mind Amsterdam, given the cast (most of whom I quite like), and that proved to be the case here. Yeah, it doesn't have much forward (narrative) momentum or suspense, but its quirk was a bit more restrained than the ads suggested (I expected a full-on farce). I didn't find it emotionally ingenuine -- its heart seems to be in the right place, and the actors are committed enough -- but rather more laid-back than one would expect a film involving a giant conspiracy to be. So, a middle-of-the-road ensemble piece (belonging on neither Worst or Best of the Year lists), and an easy enough watch.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremy on Jan 2, 2023 12:12:17 GMT -8
I like how someone else kicks off this thread every year. Really spreads the love around.
I did not expect to dislike Amsterdam as much as I did, since I also like a lot of the cast, but... it was just trying to be so many different things, and pretty indifferent about all of them. The film's message becomes clear about halfway through, but up to that point there is little to latch onto or get invested in. Honestly, I probably would have preferred it be more of a full-blown farce, as that probably would have been more entertaining. As it was, the quirk and seriousness just clashed together and left me mostly bored.
That said, the cinematography and costumes were quite good. That may not be much, but I want to start the year off on a positive note.
|
|
|
Post by ThirdMan on Jan 2, 2023 17:41:44 GMT -8
I didn't really find the film to be genuinely serious for the vast majority of its running time. It was just low-key quirky to me. But yeah, perhaps it would've been more effective as a full-blown comedy.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremy on Jan 4, 2023 20:30:13 GMT -8
I just watched a film that had a much better mix of tones than Amsterdam did, and also makes much better use of Anya-Taylor Joy - The Menu. It's a dark, often mean-spirited comedy/horror film about the darker side of fine dining, with some amusingly on-point satire about class divisions and the culture of obsession. It's got a great cast, including the aforementioned ATJ (whose hair seems to change in size, volume, and color for every role) and Ralph Fiennes, doing his funniest work since Hail Caesar! John Leguizamo plays a washed-up movie star who is simply credited as "Movie Star" which is itself wonderful.
The film's pacing is a bit off-kilter (there's at least one fakeout reveal too many, needlessly prolonging the time till the climax). But there are several hilarious moments throughout; much like Bodies Bodies Bodies, I tend to laugh the hardest when the comedy is the meanest. Make of that what you will.
Also, it's interesting that Alexander Payne was originally slated to direct this (with Emma Stone set to star instead of ATJ). Payne's a great director with a keen eye for subtle character comedy, although his most recent attempt at social class satire, Downsizing, was pretty weak. Curious how he would have handled this film. (The director they settled on is best known for helming a run of Succession episodes, which is fitting for the tone the film strives to establish.)
|
|
|
Post by ThirdMan on Jan 5, 2023 10:30:46 GMT -8
Yeah, that's one of many films I've got reserved at my public library. Didn't feel like going to the theater to see it, but I'm sure it's decent enough.
|
|
|
Post by ThirdMan on Jan 23, 2023 1:14:08 GMT -8
(Quoting Jer's comments about this movie from the previous year's thread.)
I did not find this movie to be annoying, or the editing particularly choppy. I did find it to be corny, wildly melodramatic, and deeply silly, with some very dodgy visual effects (particularly the pullbacks on the large cityscapes, and that train-bridge collapse), and a ton of completely unnecessary plot, character, and musical exposition. Literally everything is operating in huge brushstrokes here, including the military propaganda elements.
That said, it's got some visually-sumptuous and very-well-choreographed action sequences, some committed big-hearted bromance, and a lot of hugely attractive cast members, so for me, it was just good dumb fun, if one doesn't take it too seriously (and man, one shouldn't). Plus, bonus points for the two leads inexplicably Ratatouille-ing the British Empire's soldiers at one point (LOL).
Bollywood films, which tend to have a lot of super-glossy music-video-style musical numbers, probably aren't totally for me either (especially when the music spells out the plot -- or praises religious and/or political figures -- over and over again), but I didn't mind this one.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremy on Jan 23, 2023 18:15:15 GMT -8
The action choreography was the only part of RRR I really appreciated (at least when the CGI took a backseat), and is certainly impressive. But it's just not enough to carry a three-hour film where the tone is simultaneously lightweight and heavy-handed, and where the story veers wildly and unconvincingly between historical drama and superhero blockbuster.
And yeah, the Ratatouille thing was kinda cool, but we've already seen another wild 2022 comedy-drama make a live-action Ratatouille homage, so...
I dunno, I've watched a lot of films from Asia over the past three years - there are some cultures whose movies seem to really connect with me (South Korea, Japan), but there are others that just don't do much for me at all (China, India). Doesn't mean these films are necessarily bad, just means that the moviegoing audiences of some countries have broadly different tastes than my own.
As for my own recent viewings - this past weekend I watched Violent Night (a month late for Christmas, but it was only now made available to stream). It's basically Die Hard starring Santa Claus, and... yeah, that's pretty much it. The film is definitely fun, if a tad long for its thin premise and somewhat overindulgent in gory violence during its third act. David Harbour is good as a cranky, drunken Santa (if a touch less memorable than Mel Gibson in Fatman), and the ten-minute period where the story turns into an R-rated Home Alone is genuinely creative. But probably not destined to be a holiday classic.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremy on Feb 1, 2023 10:29:22 GMT -8
Roundup time, January 2023 edition!
Tár - Takes some time to warm up, as there's a lot of theme and characterization to layer in. But it pays off in spades. This is a smart, resonant film, exploring the cross between gender and power dynamics and grappling with timely themes (#MeToo, identity politics, cancel culture) in ways that are both thoughtful and subversive. Cate Blanchett is spectacular throughout, and one key scene in the third act should put her over the top with Oscar voters. Not quite my favorite film of the year, but it has - hands down - the best ending to any film in 2022.
All Quiet on the Western Front - The first 15 minutes of this film are spectacular, making for the most powerful anti-war statements in recent cinema. Unfortunately, the movie continues for over two hours beyond that, and while it certainly has its strengths - production values are high and the cast is quite good - it does grow wearying after a while, as the film insists on relentlessly driving home its "war bad" message at any and every opportunity. It doesn't help that the story is needlessly bloated by several negotiation scenes, set far from the battlefront, that disrupt the intensity of the core story in order to drive home the already-unsubtle message even further. Effective film overall, but Come and See this isn't.
M3GAN - A well-made, funny (if derivative and predictable) horror film that suffers mainly from a key character design flaw. The entire story rests on the audience believing that the titular doll should be, as advertised, the hottest toy on the market. Except she looks like a giant Cabbage Patch Kid possessed by Cthulhu. It's tough to imagine any child - let alone a roomful of marketing execs - seeing this sentient AI robot and not being just a teensy bit disturbed by her blank, dead expression. But if you can get past that, it's a fun slice of Blumhouse cheese, and not quite as violent as some of their other efforts.
Sick - A new slasher film from Kevin Williamson (writer of the original Scream) that's basically the pandemic version of Bodies Bodies Bodies. Set in April 2020, it features a fair bit of commentary about masks and social distancing, along with an obligatory killer of obnoxious college kids. Probably could have done more with the premise, but at 80 minutes or so it goes down pretty easy, and some of the (admittedly mean-spirited) humor about the early days of Covid are pretty funny. Or maybe I'm just a bad person for laughing at it, take your pick.
|
|
|
Post by ThirdMan on Feb 1, 2023 11:53:53 GMT -8
I have no opinion on M3GAN, as I haven't seen it yet, but Jeremy, be sure to check out the director's earlier effort, Housebound, from 2014. I'd forgotten about it over the years, but as I recall, it was very, very funny. I don't usually laugh-out-loud when I'm watching something alone, but I did with that movie.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremy on Feb 1, 2023 14:37:52 GMT -8
Yeah, I was looking over the director's other work on Letterboxd and noticed you had given Housebound a high rating. I'll check it out.
|
|
|
Post by guttersnipe on Feb 2, 2023 16:25:01 GMT -8
I dunno, I've watched a lot of films from Asia over the past three years - there are some cultures whose movies seem to really connect with me (South Korea, Japan), but there are others that just don't do much for me at all (China, India). Doesn't mean these films are necessarily bad, just means that the moviegoing audiences of some countries have broadly different tastes than my own. I'm not going to get my lecturer's hat on, but are you mainly watching modern mainstream films from these territories? Because political conservatism has been an absolute blight on the Chinese and Indian film industries of recent years. In the former case especially, it's not only been galling to find historical-themed cinema used as transparent propaganda vehicles, but they're usually so staggeringly bland that it makes you worry about the quality threshold of your average domestic punter. There are, however, rich arthouse veins sneaking around that still yield absolute gems from the likes of Jia Zhang-ke, Yi'nan Diao and Zhang Yimou, and Hu Bo literally died for his art having taken his own life after making but one film amidst clashes with its producers.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremy on Feb 2, 2023 19:14:16 GMT -8
I have no opinion on M3GAN, as I haven't seen it yet, but Jeremy, be sure to check out the director's earlier effort, Housebound, from 2014. I'd forgotten about it over the years, but as I recall, it was very, very funny. I don't usually laugh-out-loud when I'm watching something alone, but I did with that movie. So I watched Housebound last night (taking advantage of my bargain AMC+ subscription before it runs out) and it was a lot of fun. Definitely longer than it needed to be, and the combination of Aussie accents and iffy sound mixing made it occasionally tough to catch what the characters were saying. But it is genuinely funny in spots, filled with absurdist shock humor that meshes nicely with its horror framework. (The brief, sudden shots of graphic violence are also used well throughout the film.) There's a similar vein of dark comedy running through M3GAN, though that film is broadly more standard and formulaic in its storytelling. 2014 was a strong year for Australian horror movies, wasn't it? Between this film, The Babadook, and the original What We Do in the Shadows. (Actually two of those are from New Zealand, but geography was never my strength.)
|
|
|
Post by Jeremy on Feb 2, 2023 19:27:40 GMT -8
I'm not going to get my lecturer's hat on, but are you mainly watching modern mainstream films from these territories? Because political conservatism has been an absolute blight on the Chinese and Indian film industries of recent years. In the former case especially, it's not only been galling to find historical-themed cinema used as transparent propaganda vehicles, but they're usually so staggeringly bland that it makes you worry about the quality threshold of your average domestic punter. There are, however, rich arthouse veins sneaking around that still yield absolute gems from the likes of Jia Zhang-ke, Yi'nan Diao and Zhang Yimou, and Hu Bo literally died for his art having taken his own life after making but one film amidst clashes with its producers. Yep, you got me. Most of my experiences with Chinese film have been from the 21st century. I'm generally not a fan of their historical cinema, in part because of the uninvolving wuxia action and in part because the writing usually feels bland and staid - often, as you point out, for propagandistic reasons. (The widely praised Crouching Tiger, one of the few such films I've watched in its entirety, was... fine, but nothing that really clicked with me.) My greater point of contention with Chinese cinema is actually its animated output - insipid junk like Wish Dragon (which is like Aladdin, except the genie is a dragon and... that's about it) and Duck Duck Goose (don't get me started) that are each designed simply to fill a rectangular square of real estate on Netflix. And of course, couple that with China's continued influence over American cinema - encouraging studios to go as big and broad as possible - though happily, that influence now appears to be waning. In any event, I have heard buzz about a few acclaimed Chinese films from the modern era (Zhang Yimou's work in particular keeps popping up in my feed), so I'm sure I'll give some of them a look eventually. Just haven't been at all impressed by the (admittedly small) sample size I've checked out. Incidentally, Snipe, I watched Addams Family Values this week (seeking out some better representation of the source material after finishing the mediocre Wednesday) and Iaughed quite hard when I arrived at the moment from which you clipped your avatar.
|
|
|
Post by ThirdMan on Feb 2, 2023 23:19:28 GMT -8
I have no opinion on M3GAN, as I haven't seen it yet, but Jeremy, be sure to check out the director's earlier effort, Housebound, from 2014. I'd forgotten about it over the years, but as I recall, it was very, very funny. I don't usually laugh-out-loud when I'm watching something alone, but I did with that movie. There's a similar vein of dark comedy running through M3GAN, though that film is broadly more standard and formulaic in its storytelling. Yeah, given the number of years between Housebound and M3GAN, I'm inclined to believe that in order to get another shot at a moderately-widely-released film, the director needed to pitch something a bit more broad and formulaic to the studios. Alas, the compromises that artists have to sometimes make to get their work out there.
|
|