[REPOST] MBTI types

new

« Prev
1
Next »

Mail Robot
Newbie

beep! beep! beep! beep! whirrrrrrrrr

Posts: 41

[REPOST] MBTI types Mar 25, 2017 7:56:31 GMT -8

Quote

Post by Mail Robot on Mar 25, 2017 7:56:31 GMT -8

[THIS THREAD WAS ORIGINALLY POSTED SEPTEMBER 11, 2014.]

Odi et Amo (9/11/14):
Jungian cognitive functions and MBTI is something that has gripped me pretty recently, not as the falsely deterministic, behavioral, & attributive pseudoscience for which it is usually taken and for which it is usually criticized, but as a looser predictor for cognitive processes and tool for introspection and self-understanding.

I found myself typing people on the forum, so I was curious -- for those familiar, what are your types, Critically Touched?

I'm INFJ. Ni/Fe/Ti/Se.

For those unfamiliar (and curious), there are countless sources on the web that explain the functions and how each type's function stacks are constructed. The best that I have found are the various subreddits dedicated to MBTI and a website called personalityjunkie.com. In general, be wary of tests, as they focus on the false letter dichotomies and not on function use.

Freudian Vampire:
According to www.humanmetrics.com, I am INTP: moderate preference of Introversion over Extroversion (56%), moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (25%), moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%) and moderate preference of Perceiving over Judging (44%).

I did however take the test in about two minutes and put very little consideration into my decision, so if I spent more time and thought my results may be different.

I have a sneaking suspicion that most people here on this site will be INxy like you and me.

Iguana-on-a-stick:
I like the five factor model better.

Jung questionaires tend to annoy me. Do I feel involved in TV soaps? I don't watch the damn things! And if I did, I would not be involved because they're crap. But I do feel involved in "Buffy." And what does being more interested in a general idea than the details of its realization -mean-? I can imagine a number of things it might mean.

"Strict observance of the established rules is likely to prevent a good outcome" What the hell? Okay, now replace "the established rules" with "traffic rules." Go ahead. Tell me that observing them will prevent a good outcome. Again, I get what they mean, but that's just terrible phrasing. Would it really have hurt to write "Flexibility is more important than strictly observing rules" or something?

Bloody hell. Does anybody know a better test?

Odi et Amo:
My favorite tests directly assess cognitive function strength & preference - cognitivequiz.com/quiz.html & www.keys2cognition.com/explore.htm - but honestly the best way to figure out your type is by reading descriptions and looking within yourself.

Other Scott:
Well, I think TV soaps is a generic term meant to mean fictional stuff like Buffy rather than shows about real estate. At least, that's how I answered it.

I like the true colours personality test better myself, even if it generalizes a bit too much.

It does interest me how these things can change though. I think if I did this two years ago I would be more in FVs 56% range of introvert to extrovert, and now I'm down to 11%. And that's only because while I like being in social situations, I'm still not all that good at them.

That strict observance of established rules question was a little bit stupid. I'm not really a rules person by and large, but just ignoring them is obviously a bad idea.

Oh, I'm INTP like Freudian. And I harshly judge those J people.

Odi et Amo:

Oh, I'm INTP like Freudian. And I harshly judge those J people.

The folly is, dear Scott, that your dominant function is a judging function(Ti), while mine is a perceiving function (Ni). Being "J" means nothing intrinsically.

What each dichotomy actually does is --
I/E -- is your dominant function introverted or extraverted?
N/S -- is your favored perceiving function (the subconscious processing of information) a sensing function or an intuition function?
T/F -- is your favored judging function (the conscious systematizing of information) a feeling function or a thinking function?
P/J -- among your top two functions, one of which will be introverted and one of which will be extraverted, one of which will a be perceiving function and one of which will be a judging function, will your judging function be extraverted and perceiving function be introverted (J) or vice versa (P)?

Every type has one feeling function, one thinking function, one intuition function, and one sensing function. The dominant is the opposite of the inferior (for an INTP, Ti & Fe), while the auxiliary is the opposite of the tertiary (Ne & Si).

What does each function do?
Se (extraverted sensing) -- takes in information in a clear, unfiltered, fully-in-the-moment way.
Si (introverted sensing) -- takes in information and compares it to stores of past information.
Ne (extraverted intuition) -- takes in a piece of information and sees its multiple different possibilities. Divergent abstraction.
Ni (introverted intuition) -- takes pieces of information and fuses them into a singular pattern/conclusion. Convergent abstraction.
Fe (extraverted feeling) -- systemizes values/principles according to a collective standard. Strongly harmony-seeking.
Fi (introverted feeling) -- systemizes values/principles according to an individual standard. Strongly authenticity-seeking.
Te (extraverted thinking) -- systemizes logical standards according to objective, external standards.
Ti (introverted thinking) -- systemized logical standards according to subjective, internal standards.

MikeJer:
I haven't taken any quizzes, but I think I'm an INTP.

I have a sneaking suspicion that most people here on this site will be INxy like you and me.

This.

Boscalyn:
INFJ. People who spend their time on internet forum tend to be introverts for obvious reasons, and I think it's safe to say they'd be seeking out authenticity.

Sort of curious what you pegged everyone as, Odi.

Jay:
INTP. But the spectrum always varies. I'm usually 90% on I and ~60 on N. T takes a moderate preference over F (I've had it flip before) and P usually wins out over J but I've scored a J five or six times.

Took Odi et Amo's supplementary keys2cognition test and got Dominant Process of Introverted Thinking and Auxiliary Process of Extroverted Intuiting. Makes sense. I tend to think a lot on my own and try to sort out what will and will not work, but I'm not especially into the universal application of theory (even if I love to look for patterns) and tend to fly by my instruments socially by reading reactions. Not that my foresight is great

Firewalkwithme:
Wow, this is an INxx love-fest!

I´m an INFJ as well.
For me it makes a lot of sense that I would be drawn to a site like criticallytouched.com. I think what hooked me was Mike´s willingness to give every episode, every season, every character etc. the benefit of the doubt and find good within the bad and vice versa. I love it when someone takes the time to look at something from a lot of different angles instead of viewing things only in black and white-terms. What was also very appealing to me was Mike´s mission statement to show the internet the good things about the often-maglined seasons 4-7 of "Buffy".
I also enjoy reading well-written, analytical reviews about television that aren´t just scratching the surface and do more than just showing a constantly (inappropriate) snarky and superior attitude towards the medium. (The worst offender in this case would be the televisionwithoutpity-reviews of "Buffy". Headache-inducing to read and without any depth whatsoever.)

Jeremy:
I have no idea what you're all talking about, but I just took the test and it tells me I'm ISTJ.

However, they tell me that the "Sensing" factor beat out the "Feeling" factor by the slimmest of margins. So don't worry, I'm not that different from the rest of you, and I might still be a good fit for Critically Touched after all.

Argh. Now they've made me self-conscious.

Odi et Amo:
Looks like Critically Touched is shaping up into INTPs on one side and INFJs on the other, with Jeremy in the middle of the battlefield holding a tattered flag.

Odi et Amo:

INFJ. People who spend their time on internet forum tend to be introverts for obvious reasons, and I think it's safe to say they'd be seeking out authenticity.

Sort of curious what you pegged everyone as, Odi.

I had Freudian & Alex as INTJ (Alex just exudes Ni). Mike definitely INTP. Jay I could see INTP or INFP. Buffyholic I pegged as ESFP. Iguana I think I had as ISTP. I had you as INFJ, and noted I tended best to follow your arguments and discussion points. Jeremy I had as ISTJ. Scott I had as ENTP. Guttersnipe and Zarnium I had as INFP. I have not been lurking that long, so I just have the biggest posters from my time here figured.

Other Scott:
I stopped crying about my ruined joke long enough to try to puzzle through this stuff. I don't think it's helping me tell what I am very well. After puzzling it through, I'm somewhere between ENTP and INTP, which is exactly what the test (and Odi, once you judge introverted and extroverted relative to the other members of the forum, I guess) were saying.

Mostly this stuff makes my head hurt.

Mail Robot
Newbie

beep! beep! beep! beep! whirrrrrrrrr

Posts: 41

[REPOST] MBTI types Mar 25, 2017 8:07:36 GMT -8

Quote

Post by Mail Robot on Mar 25, 2017 8:07:36 GMT -8

Iguana-on-a-stick (9/12/14):

Now this I find very interesting. Interesting enough I want to actually read this stuff to see if you're right, where I'm concerned at least.

I read some of that profile ISTP on the site you mentioned, and it... parts of it kinda fit, maybe. Not sure. I'll have to read more.

I did the test on that same site (personality junkie. Long live mailinator so I don't have to sign up for spam.) and got...

Strong preference for introversion. Duh. I knew that.
Equal scores for Sensing and Intuition. I also got that on other tests. I think I'm pretty much in the middle, here. (Indeed, for a lot of questions my instinctive response was "Both!")
Strong preference for Feeling over Thinking. That surprised me, kinda. But looking at the questions that governed those aspects, it makes sense. In personal interactions, in my family, at work, I tend to act as the mediator and peacekeeper, resolving conflicts, etc. I'm not very competitive. (Outside of debates, which I enjoy a lot. So I may well appear different when writing online.)
Finally, a moderate preference for Judging over Perceiving. But it's really too close to be statistically significant, I'd say. Again, reading the descriptions this makes sense to me.

So I could be ISFJ. Or INFJ. Or INFP. Or ISFP. Huh. Well, looks like I haven't figured it out yet.

Honestly, reading the profiles for all of these on that site... it all smacks a bit of horoscopes to me. INFP are all nature lovers? And tend to have an ectomorphic body build? Really?

Odi et Amo:

So I could be ISFJ. Or INFJ. Or INFP. Or ISFP. Huh. Well, looks like I haven't figured it out yet.

Honestly, reading the profiles for all of these on that site... it all smacks a bit of horoscopes to me. INFP are all nature lovers? And tend to have an ectomorphic body build? Really?

You are absolutely correct in that parts of those descriptions that focus on behavior and attributes are horseshit. And that body type stuff is definitely horseshit. The cognitive aspects of the profiles on that site, however, are rock solid.

It seems clear to me that you use Fe & Ti in terms of judging functions. As far as perceiving functions...well, those are usually more difficult to deduce. Let me know how your search goes.

Freudian Vampire:
What gave you the impression that Scott and Buffyholic were extroverted, out of interest?

I took Odi et Amo's test and got INTP again, so I'm inclined to believe that's accurate. That said, I'm not one for self-analysis, and some of the questions are a little too vague for me to answer properly.

Thus far:

Odi et Amo: INFJ (?)
Other Scott: INTP
MikeJer: INTP
Boscalyn: INFJ
Jay: INTP
Firewalkwithme: INFJ (hello, by the way)
Jeremy: ISTJ
Iguana: (?)

Which gives us a slight majority for INTP with INFJ not far behind.

Other Scott:
I didn't realize Odi et Amo posted a different independent test. I got INTP narrowly over ENTP again, so I'm feeling fairly confident about that.

I'm also interested in the cues OeA used to evaluate members of this forum. Figuring out your own personality type is interesting, but being able to pick up on others and use that in your interactions with them is a legitimately useful skill.

Iguana-on-a-stick:
Yes, I'm interested in that too. Quite impressive observations either way.

I imagine extroversion/introversion would be easiest to peg from general conversation, even online. For example, I'd also have pegged Buffyholic as extroverted, because she seems to be a lot more outgoing than the typical forum curmudgeon such as myself. :-)

Wouldn't have been able to peg Scott one way or the other, though.

Odi et Amo:
As an Ni-dominant type myself (indeed INFJ), I tend to pick up fragments of function use within interactions and fuse them into types. I wish I could give a more proceedural account, but I can't. I just make leaps.

I'll give you some examples; it's usually easier to figure out the judging functions that a given individual uses. Take feeling functions. People like Mike and Boscalyn tend to slant more overtly towards a harmonious, meeting-in-the-middle form of argument - this is clear, developed Fe (extraverted feeling), which means additional use of Ti and either xxTP or xxFJ. Alex, meanwhile, tends to assert his side more based on his internal principles and rarely backs down from his (very well-reasoned) arguments. This indicates use of Fi, which means additional use of Te and either xxFP or xxTJ.

In Scott's case, I had a feeling he used Ti and Ne as his top two functions (meaning xNTP), but, in a community of quirky people, he stood out in particular as the quirkiest and the most open, which in the end pushed me to pick Ne/Ti over Ti/Ne. In any case, he seems to be pretty balanced in use of his dom & aux functions. In particular, I remember observing the Freudian v. Alex thread with Scott popping up. Alex would offer an intense, grandiose unified theory driven by inductive reasoning (Ni/Te/Fi), Freudian would find a million things to pick holes in calmly (Ti/Ne), and Scott would drop in to keep proceedings zany and off-the-wall (Ne/Ti).

This process happens with each function, eventually leading me to recognize a pattern and form a type based on use of individual functions. I'm obviously not always right, though. More than anything, I love to help others work through their own type, as opposed to just asserting what I think theirs is. I guess I'm lucky to have some friends who enjoy Jungian functions & MBTI as much as I do.

Feel free to talk to me about it or anything else. The politeness and general civility here makes me smile.

Freudian Vampire:

Freudian would find a million things to pick holes in calmly

I am making that my new mission statement.

I would have pegged buffyholic as extroverted too, except I remember a few very old threads where she said she was self-reliant and enjoyed being alone (or something along those lines), which brings me to think the opposite.

Iguana-on-a-stick (9/13/14):
It's been a while since I saw her post. Clearly, we need to poke her and get her own input on this.

Love&Hate: Interesting insights. Honestly, most of this type-stuff is still Greek to me, but it's an intriguing way to view interactions, I imagine.

Other Scott:
Well she did just post this morning about her Breaking Bad watching, so she may just be avoiding this thread.

Jeremy:
I'm assuming (though given my lack of knowledge about Jungian psychology, just guessing) that Odi's pegging my ISTJ results is reflective of my impulsiveness (some would say recklessness) on this site.

Review a show with 155 episodes? Sure, I'll do it! Write an article about a show I don't like despite the fact that the Internet will roast me for it? Why not! Plan a major Blog post for December and not tell anyone about it? But of course!

I'm still self-conscious, as you can see.

Other Scott (9/14/14):
Ah, the old sentence that is rendered untrue by its own existence. A true classic.

Also, on an unrelated note: Freudian, I'm not talking to you.

Freudian Vampire:
Nor am I talking to you.

My crystal ball predicts that Jeremy's blog post will be some kind of retrospective on the TV year, perhaps a Top 10 or even an article about current trends.

Boscalyn:

Agreed, Iguana.

Which reminds me: I'm currently working on a list for the West Wing site. I won't reveal much, but it has to do with the Top 25 Something-or-Others.

Could these be the same thing??

Freudian Vampire:
I wouldn't think so, Boscalyn, because in that post Jeremy specifies 'for the West Wing site' whereas here he mentions a Blog post. There's a specific articles section for all of the reviewed shows and anything specifically focused on The West Wing would likely go there.

Odi et Amo:

I'm assuming (though given my lack of knowledge about Jungian psychology, just guessing) that Odi's pegging my ISTJ results is reflective of my impulsiveness (some would say recklessness) on this site.

That's pretty much it. Dominant and inferior functions (in your case Si & Ne) frequently dovetail and leapfrog one another, especially in adolescence and young adulthood. Your inferior Ne you have the least amount of control over, so it manifests as your seeing all of these possibilities and their not being filtered through your other functions. The end result is what you noted as impulsivity, but what I would say is unchecked creative agency being acted out.

Jeremy:

Dominant and inferior functions (in your case Si & Ne) frequently dovetail and leapfrog one another, especially in adolescence and young adulthood.

Hm. And I think Mike was my age when he first decided to review every episode of Buffy. There must be some kind of trend here.

I wouldn't think so, Boscalyn, because in that post Jeremy specifies 'for the West Wing site' whereas here he mentions a Blog post. There's a specific articles section for all of the reviewed shows and anything specifically focused on The West Wing would likely go there.

That's correct, Freudian. The "Top 25 West Wing Episodes" list will likely be out sometime in October. The Blog thing will be a couple of months later.

As for what said Blog post will be about... you're not entirely wrong, but your crystal ball is still pretty hazy. All I'll say is that it will likely be remembered as a Critically Touched "event".¹

Other Scott:
I'm going to go with "The Critically Touched Forum Members Who Inspire Me."

It better not be a year end top ten list of current shows. I want that gig.

Odi et Amo:
I will go on record with Best. Shows. Ever.

Jeremy:

I'm going to go with "The Critically Touched Forum Members Who Inspire Me."

That would make an interesting Top Ten list. But I'd get bored talking about myself ten times.

It better not be a year end top ten list of current shows. I want that gig.

*snicker snicker*

...Just kidding.

(1. HE IS REFERRING TO THE "BEST SHOWS OF THE LUSTRUM" COUNTDOWN.)

Mail Robot
Newbie

beep! beep! beep! beep! whirrrrrrrrr

Posts: 41

[REPOST] MBTI types Mar 25, 2017 8:17:23 GMT -8

Quote

Post by Mail Robot on Mar 25, 2017 8:17:23 GMT -8

nathan.taurus (9/14/14):
Non-detailed questions with only two possible answers doesn't yield a lot of truth.

Anyway, I took it out of curiosity and I am: ISTJ

33%/1%/11%/12% with little or no preference between sensing and intuition. So does that mean I could be IITJ.

Odi et Amo (9/16/14):
For interested parties (read:my OG Scott), I remembered another really good test.

This one focuses on functions, the hallmark of a good test, and also handily estimates the likelihood of your being every type. It's a very smart test, able to match my own pondered likelihood hierarchy of my type dead on (which was INFJ>ENFJ>INTJ>INTP>INFP...)

www.teamtechnology.co.uk/personality/test/mmdi/

This is a great website full of typings and creative explanations of the functions.

celebritytypes.com

This is another test that I don't like very much (some bizarre question choices, like equating liking indie rock to Ne...) but is worth putting out there.

similarminds.com/classic_jung.html

The MBTI subreddit (and the INFP, INFJ, INTP, & INTJ subreddits as well. Reddit is the ultimate manifestation of the internet's INxx sensibilities) are also full of extremely knowledgeable and kind people.

Noah (10/09/14):
INFJ. No question.

Boscalyn (10/17/14):
I missed this earlier, but *high five*

Stake&Cheese (10/19/14):
I'm apparently an ENFP, which sounds about right. I'm not sure how real this stuff is, but it's interesting.

Iguana-on-a-stick:
There's a lot of weird stuff surrounding it, but people like Odi seem to be able to extract some sense from this.

Still, the five-factor personality system I mentioned on the first page here makes a lot more intuitive sense to me. When I do that test, I feel like the results describe something useful about someone.

Again though, that's partially because I still don't really understand this "function" stuff and can't be arsed to read up on it.

Stake&Cheese (10/20/14):
Yeah, I'm thinking I might be an ENTP, just because I'm an argumentative dick, but it's all very nebulous.

Noah:
*high five*

Boscalyn (3/07/15):
I'm worried, guys. I just retook this test and got ISFP. Granted, the S and P were very, very, close, but I'm still highly confused.

unkinhead (3/08/15):
I avoided this thread for awhile because I read "MBTI types" and thought "Never heard of it! Next!"

But, I actually have done this rather often through the years just for fun. I have always resulted in INTP.

It's interesting that it's the majority of people around here considering the very low percentile of INTP's there are in general (3.5%). Although the introverted part I pretty much figured would apply to pretty much everyone here.

This site gives some cool facts and some cool affirmations for us 3.5%

oddlydevelopedtypes.com/INTP

"Or that INTPs are the type most likely to smoke." I don't smoke, but I have an addictive personality, I wonder if having an addictive personality is common among INTP's.

"The beauty of pure reason and perfectly designed systems is not lost on INTPs. They appreciate the design of cleverly-engineered products and carefully constructed statements of logic, whether in the form of arguments, equations, or computer code. They feel a sense of satisfaction when they see facts appear in that fall in line with their mental model of a situation. " Yup x10000

The antithetical is also true: "The shittiness of pure stupidity and terribly designed systems is not lost on INTPs. They fucking hate the design of awfully-engineered products and unseemly constructed statements of logic, whether in the form of YouTube comments, Anita Sarkeesian, or Flat Earthers."

Speaking of Anita, I just have to share this...Being a video gamer who has played enjoyed the game Hitman: Absolution I laughed so hysterically at this clip.

www.tubechop.com/watch/5374326

Whew, it's equal parts embarrassingly idiotic, and extremely hilarious (imo).

EDIT:

HAHAHA Almost forgot this: www.tubechop.com/watch/5374357

...Okay sorry I didn't mean to derail this thread with hilarious YT clips...Resume your conversation!

Boscalyn (6/20/16):
Ok, I took the test *yet again* and came up INFJ. All is well with the world.

Monica:
I'm ENFP, which is actually strangely accurate considering all of what I've read that's supposed to mean.

unkinhead:
This kind of reminds me of my feelings when I take pseudo-science (or pseudo-pseudo-science) tests that 'determine' your personality (astrology, the Chinese zodiac, etc).

I always go into it ready to scoff at how silly these things are, only to be really frustrated when it describes me exactly.

I'm like "shit, I can't be that guy who can 100% confirm that these tests are BS". Followed by a sudden thought that maybe we are destined to our fates and personality by the date we were born. At which point I storm out of the restaurant angrily and leave no tip.

Screw your delicious duck sauce and your spicy orange chicken! I refuse to give up my individuality!

Odi et Amo:
If y'all are curious, this site [celebritytypes.com] has some good articles and fun quizzes (most of which are based on the Big 5), as well as Jungian typings for a slew of people.

I don't mind the Big 5, either. My breakdown there is:

Extremely high Openness
Above-average Conscientiousness
Average Extraversion
High Agreeableness
Very low Neuroticism

unkinhead:
Haha.

I got...are you ready for your mind to be blown....

Average for all 5.

Although if I were being self-analytical I would say more accurately I'm probably:

Openness: Above-Average
Conscientiousness: Low
Extroversion: About 3 months ago I would have said very low, now I would probably say below-average to average.
Agreeableness: Average
Neuroticism: Below-Average

Stake&Cheese:
Openness: Average
Conscientiousness: Average (probably should be below average)
Extroversion: Very high
Agreeableness: Average
Neuroticism: Low

Also, Hi-Five for being ENP buddies, Monica! I'm pretty balanced between F and T, although I probably trend closer to T.

Bean32 (9/24/16):
Representing INFP over here.

Flamepillar112:
I'm an INTJ, but I although think these tests are a bit wank.

Bean32:
I see them more as loose guidelines since no one person can be described by a personality type. I do like the Meyers Briggs. Carl Jung developed the original theory of psychological types and described them as mental functions that explored ways people process information and make decisions. I like thinking about the Meyer's Briggs from that angle, rather than defining people by the four letters. With that being said, I do feel like INFP describes me pretty well and lines up with my career interests.

filibanfi (11/10/16):
Uh, what a fun thread.

I'm INTP, too, even if I resulted INTJ in a copule of tests.

Flamepillar112 (12/24/16):
So close Fili. So close.

On closer evaluation, the INTJ type is scarily accurate about my personality.

unkinhead:
I find it amusing that everyone here is very similar. I also sometimes test INFP but generally INTP. It's usually frightfully close on the Thinking/Feeling spectrum for the tests that show your placement on it for each function.

I only have met one other INTP in real life. We're very good friends but even still I actually find it the most difficult to talk to her then others in our crowd verbal-wise (although more non verbal mutual understanding) even though neither of us have any difficulty verbally communicating with others.. Having some complimentary opposing functions is more ideal for bonding thru verbal communication I think.

Zarnium:
I got INTJ.

INTJ
Introvert(28%) iNtuitive(16%) Thinking(6%) Judging(56%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (28%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (16%)
You have slight preference of Thinking over Feeling (6%)
You have moderate preference of Judging over Perceiving (56%)

Not really surprised? Though I have to admit, I didn't understand what many of the questions were supposed to be about. "You easily understand new theoretical principles?" Huh?

unkinhead:

The four types (INTJ, INFJ, ENTJ, AND INTP) account for 72% of the high-IQ population but only 9% of the total population.

Let me just massage our collective ego real quick. xD

Stake&Cheese (2/19/17):
Most of my best friends are some variety of ENP, because they have a high threshold for my being a dick, and can both keep up with me when we're sitting around bullshitting and enjoy getting drunk and acting like an idiot with me.

My job gave us a Cultural Index test, and I'm apparently very high A (assertiveness/autonomy) and B (extroversion), with low C (patience) and terrifyingly low D (organizational skills). Along with those four, I've got high Logic and Creativity.

So, yeah.

unkinhead:
Speaking of MBTI! Recently been hanging out with a female ENTP (i'm intp) irl, and I find the differences rather interesting. In arguments for example she is way quicker at coming up with new ideas and arguments, but with less regard for logical details. Where as I'm exactly the inverse. So generally, if I present an argument it's very difficult for her to take it down, conversely, if she overloads me with many creative arguments I can't poke holes in them fast enough, it also doesn't help that sometimes they are rather good arguments, so as a multitude stacks up with some that need some time to sift through I can be at a loss for words.

Basically I find the thinking/debating dynamic we have to be very interesting, looking up MBTI types and thinking functions basically confirmed why this was (in short, our primary and secondary Mbti functions are inversed, which makes sense when you read their differences - Ti dom vs Ne dom)

Quiara Grade School Posts: 775	[REPOST] MBTI types Mar 25, 2017 14:00:54 GMT -8 Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by Quiara on Mar 25, 2017 14:00:54 GMT -8 What type do you think the mail robot is? I've got it pegged as ISTJ.

Incandescence 112 Grade School Posts: 679	[REPOST] MBTI types Mar 25, 2017 15:34:32 GMT -8 Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by Incandescence 112 on Mar 25, 2017 15:34:32 GMT -8 "The Logistician" sounds about right. If it was "The Entertainer" or something, that might be a cause for alarm.
	“We've barely begun, and already this is the worst, unmitigated disaster of my career.” —Captain Rip Hunter.

[REPOST] MBTI types

Post by Mail Robot on Mar 25, 2017 7:56:31 GMT -8

Post by Mail Robot on Mar 25, 2017 8:07:36 GMT -8

Post by Mail Robot on Mar 25, 2017 8:17:23 GMT -8

Post by Quiara on Mar 25, 2017 14:00:54 GMT -8

Post by Incandescence 112 on Mar 25, 2017 15:34:32 GMT -8