|
Post by guttersnipe on Oct 3, 2022 15:12:49 GMT -8
Well, Summer is over, the nights are drawing in, and I'm already buying Halloween trinkets from the local shops, because it's that time again! 1) Necromania: A Tale of Weird Love! (1971, Edward D. Wood Jr.) - 3/10* 2) Patrick (1978, Richard Franklin) - 7/10 3) Eat Locals (2017, Jason Flemyng) - 4/10 4) Halloween II (2009, Rob Zombie) - 5/10 5) Midsommar (2019, Ari Aster) - 6/10 6) Army of the Dead (2021, Zack Snyder) - 6/10 7) The Mutations (1974, Jack Cardiff) - 5/10 8) The Seventh Sign (1988, Carl Schultz) - 6/10 9) Bird Box (2018, Susanne Bier) - 6/10 10) Werewolf by Night (2022, Michael Giacchino) - 5/10 11) Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022, Sam Raimi) - 6/10 12) The Horror of It All (1964, Terence Fisher) - 3/10** 13) Perfect Blue (1998, Satoshi Kon) - 8/10 [rewatch, of course] 14) Dinosaurus! (1960, Irvin S. Yeaworth Jr.) - 4/10 15) The Face Behind the Mask (1941, Robert Florey) - 7/10 16) The Magician (1926, Rex Ingram) - 6/10 17) The Vampire and the Ballerina (1960, Renato Polselli) - 6/10 18) The Hanging Woman (1973, José Luis Merino) - 5/10 19) Visitors from the Arkana Galaxy (1981, Dusan Vukotic) - 6/10 20) The Turning (2020, Floria Sigismondi) - 4/10*** 21) Host (2020, Rob Savage) - 5/10 22) Ilsa: She Wolf of the SS (1975, Don Edmonds) - 4/10 23) The Brotherhood of Satan (1971, Bernard McEveety) - 3/10 24) The Ghost of Sierra de Cobre (1964, Joseph Stefano) - 6/10 25) One Body Too Many (1944, Frank McDonald) - 4/10 * Because what better way to kick off the October Challenge than with an hour-long Ed Wood picture hosted on a porn site with sporadic and delayed Russian dubbing? ** An uncharacteristically terrible film from a master of the genre. I blame a dreadful script and Pat Boone *** Hardly the best adaptation I've seen of The Turn of the Screw, not the worst, either. What persuaded Sigismondi to reserve her most indelible Images for the end credits??
|
|
|
Post by ThirdMan on Oct 3, 2022 16:39:04 GMT -8
I'd actually be more interested in hearing your thoughts on Blonde, assuming you've watched it by now. I thought it was well-directed and acted, with pretty lush cinematography, but that it could accurately be described as "misery porn". I'm inclined to believe Norma Jeane had a little more light in her life than was conveyed in this picture.
|
|
|
Post by guttersnipe on Oct 3, 2022 17:33:50 GMT -8
I didn't end up watching it yet after all (primarily due to fatigue), but I'll fill you in. Judging by her profile in the excellent Goddess by Anthony Summers, I'd actually argue a lot of her hitherto representations actually soft-pedalled her various traumas and misadventures, which is partly why The Misfits feels so autobiographical; it's where the performance of her public persona and her frustrated personal life intersect, and is all the more tragic for doing so as a swansong.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremy on Oct 19, 2022 16:00:14 GMT -8
10) Werewolf by Night (2022, Michael Giacchino) - 5/10 11) Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022, Sam Raimi) - 6/10 Haha, I didn't even realize that Marvel had released two horror-themed productions this year. (Three if you count Morbius, but please don't count Morbius.) I will actually take the not-particularly-bold stance and say that I found Werewolf by Night to be the best MCU product of 2022, not that the competition has been particularly strong. Interesting that Michael Giacchino, so long known as the go-to music man for big-budget Hollywood, knows how to frame a shot and stage an action scene better than a lot of MCU directors. But it seems like you weren't impressed?
|
|
|
Post by ThirdMan on Oct 24, 2022 14:20:59 GMT -8
10) Werewolf by Night (2022, Michael Giacchino) - 5/10 11) Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022, Sam Raimi) - 6/10 Haha, I didn't even realize that Marvel had released two horror-themed productions this year. (Three if you count Morbius, but please don't count Morbius.) I will actually take the not-particularly-bold stance and say that I found Werewolf by Night to be the best MCU product of 2022, not that the competition has been particularly strong. Interesting that Michael Giacchino, so long known as the go-to music man for big-budget Hollywood, knows how to frame a shot and stage an action scene better than a lot of MCU directors. But it seems like you weren't impressed? I generally liked Werewolf by Night, but I will say that if you're gonna do a 30s/40s-style monster pic, perhaps just commit to the bit, and don't use a bunch of CGI in rendering the monster? Practical effects, baby.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremy on Oct 25, 2022 5:24:10 GMT -8
Disney use practical effects? In 2022? Next thing you're gonna expect the Rescue Rangers movie to render their 2D-animated lead character with actual 2D animation.
|
|
|
Post by guttersnipe on Nov 1, 2022 12:39:42 GMT -8
Sorry for the lateness, I acfually spent a good chunk of October with my partner and only did some film catch-up towards the end (evidently not enough to meet the thrity-one threshold).
As for Werewolf, no, not a fan. I can't help but feel like Marvel has created a rod for its back by fashioning its filmography to such a recipe that any deviation from it is celebrated as innovative, even when that's just a riff on a different existing model. Even so, I didn't feel like it captured the old Universal Monsters feel terribly well anyway; it's in the wrong aspect ratio, it's frequently handheld, there's a lot of use of uncharacteristic low-angle and generally didn't strike me as terribly evocative of the era beyond the obvious. It does boast some occasional nice chiaroscuro and an impressively-sustained fight sequence at the end, but this was on the back of a frightfully uninteresting protagonist, some tedious exposition and an absolutely shrill villain. The fact that it's short is handy I guess, but really just damns it with faint praise.
|
|
|
Post by guttersnipe on Nov 1, 2022 13:13:59 GMT -8
I'd actually be more interested in hearing your thoughts on Blonde, assuming you've watched it by now. I thought it was well-directed and acted, with pretty lush cinematography, but that it could accurately be described as "misery porn". I'm inclined to believe Norma Jeane had a little more light in her life than was conveyed in this picture. Very fond, as it emerges. It's a real sort of deep-dive film, something of a refresher in comparison to a lot of films that have only dealt with Marilyn in a very off-hand and spectatorish way, proving nothing immersive and rewarding to folks who have really done their homework on her (personally I was really pleased with moments like being able to identify an in media res shot from Don't Bother to Knock long before the film clarifies what it's recreating). Given that Monroe is almost now a touchstone for the 'status' of actresses in Hollywood, I felt it evokes the Marlowe quote later tattooed on Angelina Jolie's stomach: "That Which Nourishes Me Also Destroys Me", because Blonde's kaleidoscopic editing style crashes together scenes of Marilyn getting touched up on the casting couch with a similar moment in All About Eve to screaming her guts out at Method school, contrasting her personal demons with her characters (masks, if you will) and the sort of roles she wouldn't really get to play until her swansong in The Misfits. This suspension if disbelief is key to scenes like her finding the tiger teddy in the street; a filmic cliché but given vitality given how her 'real' life became indistinguishable from her roles, such was the necessity to 'be' Marilyn whenever she wasn't alone and reading a book, for example. Interestingly I felt like Dominik was perhaps contemptuous of most of Marilyn's filmography (or at least her roles within them), which is an interesting slant on most biopics which seek to exemplify their subject's talents. It's true that this makes the film somewhat relentless in its sequencing of disappointment and trauma, but it does so by arresting cinematic means; Marilyn's new hairdo is revealed to the audience via a reflection in Arthur Miller's glasses, her imagined father's voice overlays her beating at the hands of "Daddy" DiMaggio, the blossoms of blood that express her miscarriage and the subsequent confusion that carries over on the set of Some Like It Hot and the ugly, braying faces of the lustful paparazzi. I do feel it makes some forceful missteps, like having her vomit directly into camera and correlating JFK's orgasm with a shot from Invasion of the Flying Saucers, but for the most part I felt this was a tour-de-force, with that one shot of the elephant door almost filling the frame one of the best images of the year. I'm reminded of Anthony Summers' quote that pretty much sums it up on an experiential level: "In fantasy, Marilyn was now wedded to all America. In the real world, she was a shipwreck in the arms of many, with a baseball champion for sheet anchor".
|
|
|
Post by Jeremy on Nov 1, 2022 16:25:42 GMT -8
Sorry for the lateness, I acfually spent a good chunk of October with my partner and only did some film catch-up towards the end (evidently not enough to meet the thrity-one threshold). Hey, don't be so hard on yourself. I think I only watched about 17 or 18 horror-themed films this October, including new releases. Did not watch Host - my discount Shudder subscription expired a while ago - but I did make it halfway through Blumhouse's Dashcam, a new film from the same director, before being too annoyed to continue. Interesting how both these films directly base their storylines around Covid fallout (with the latter centering on one of the most cartoonish political caricatures I've ever seen in a motion picture). I suppose Marvel is at the point where my expectations have been unavoidably lowered (no longer expecting them to turn out the next Winter Soldier), so it's refreshing to see them deviate from the formula, even if it's still within their typical box-checking boundaries. I do find it funny that my 13-year-old neighbor - who generally gobbles up all things Marvel - passed on checking it out, mainly because he is turned off by B&W films. I think that qualifies Werewolf by Night as niche fare, at least by MCU standards. (In other news, I think the link you just posted at the bottom of the masterpost is bouncing back to this page.)
|
|
|
Post by guttersnipe on Nov 1, 2022 17:55:33 GMT -8
The [●REC] series aside, I've maintained since Blair Witch that found footage is really just an excuse for bad cinematography. Even Bernard Rose couldn't make anything but an atrocity from the format.
Oh, I was just trying to link to another Turn of the Screw adaptation from 1999 called Presence of Mind, which was equally insipid.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremy on Nov 1, 2022 20:21:19 GMT -8
The [●REC] series aside, I've maintained since Blair Witch that found footage is really just an excuse for bad cinematography. Even Bernard Rose couldn't make anything but an atrocity from the format. While it is often used as a corner-cutting measure and has largely been diluted by market oversaturation, I maintain that there are clever ways to do found-footage horror, particularly when it comes to crafting a feel of natural claustrophobia. Sure, Paranormal Activity has way too many sequels, but the original film is still a great example of effectively creepy minimalist filmmaking, and in fact benefits from its grainy look and limited cinematography. (In contrast, the more notorious misfires - e.g. Shyamalan's The Visit - don't work because they come off as too polished in their filmmaking, and are thus not believable as home-video footage.) Have never seen any of the [●REC] films; perhaps I'll give the first one a look.
|
|
|
Post by Jay on Nov 2, 2022 10:41:55 GMT -8
I only really have familiarity with the novella, The Turn of the Screw, but it seems like something that would be genuinely challenging to adapt because it's not clear how many of the happenings are real or imagined. Or rather, there's a lot of room for error in the execution. Much as I am a fan of Mackenzie Davis, I really felt no inclination to seek out The Turning since it foregrounded a lot of "the kids are not all right" aspects in the trailer and I feel like horror cinema has gone too frequently to that well of late.
Incidentally, [●REC] was one of the last movies I saw with Mikejer, years ago now, as he got into the series and thought that it handled its stuff particularly well. Most of the other found footage setups I've dabbled in since have been wanting (I couldn't get through VHS), but I had a good time with [●REC] and its occasional twists. Haven't seen the U.S. version though, which I feel is a slight to my Doug Jones fandom.
|
|
|
Post by guttersnipe on Nov 6, 2022 12:11:35 GMT -8
While it is often used as a corner-cutting measure and has largely been diluted by market oversaturation, I maintain that there are clever ways to do found-footage horror, particularly when it comes to crafting a feel of natural claustrophobia. Sure, Paranormal Activity has way too many sequels, but the original film is still a great example of effectively creepy minimalist filmmaking, and in fact benefits from its grainy look and limited cinematography. (In contrast, the more notorious misfires - e.g. Shyamalan's The Visit - don't work because they come off as too polished in their filmmaking, and are thus not believable as home-video footage.) Have never seen any of the [●REC] films; perhaps I'll give the first one a look. I've not seen The Visit, but it strikes me as something of a balancing act, and reminds me of Terry Gilliam's argument that voiceovers either work brilliantly or not at all, citing those of Taxi Driver and the theatrical Blade Runner as respective examples. The BBC actually managed to pre-empt this movement with Ghostwatch, a TV movie masquerading as an interrupted live TV programme, and apparently caused mass complaints, public anxiety and even a suicide, such was its verite. EDIT: Doesn't embed, but anyway archive.org/details/Ghostwatch
|
|